Let’s say we have a situation, as I encountered one, where
we need to use VRF lite between two interfaces, each one on different VRF, and
we need to have connectivity between the two VRF’s.
This is the network topology:
The configuration is pretty much the same as working with
PE/MPLS-VPN network but with slight difference.
R1 is the router which connected to 3 interfaces, Fa1/0 is
connected to VRF RED, Fa1/1 is connected to VRF BLUE and Fa2/0 is connected to
R4 through the global routing table.
So first configure the VRF’s on R1 with the corresponding
interfaces:
ip vrf BLUE
rd 200:200
route-target export 200:200
route-target import 200:200
!
ip vrf RED
rd 100:100
route-target export 100:100
route-target import 100:100
!
interface FastEthernet1/0
ip vrf forwarding RED
ip address 10.1.12.1 255.255.255.0
duplex auto
speed auto
!
interface FastEthernet1/1
ip vrf forwarding BLUE
ip address 10.1.13.1 255.255.255.0
duplex auto
speed auto
!
|
Then configure BGP, without peers, but with address-families:
router bgp 65000
no synchronization
bgp log-neighbor-changes
no auto-summary
!
address-family ipv4 vrf RED
redistribute connected
redistribute static
no synchronization
exit-address-family
!
address-family ipv4 vrf BLUE
redistribute connected
redistribute static
no synchronization
exit-address-family
!
|
Then add route import/export between the two VRF’s:
ip vrf BLUE
rd 200:200
route-target import 100:100
!
ip vrf RED
route-target import 200:200
!
|
VRF BLUE import VRF RED (100:100) while VRF RED import VRF
BLUE (200:200).
The routing table on VRF RED (on R1):
R1#show ip route vrf RED
Routing Table: RED
Codes: C - connected, S -
static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O -
OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 -
OSPF NSSA external type 2
E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF
external type 2
i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 -
IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2
ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate
default, U - per-user static route
o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded
static route
Gateway of last resort is not
set
B 192.168.31.0/24 [20/0] via 10.1.13.3
(BLUE), 00:21:10
S 192.168.21.0/24 [1/0] via 10.1.12.2
10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 2 subnets
B 10.1.13.0 is directly connected,
00:20:25, FastEthernet1/1
C 10.1.12.0 is directly connected,
FastEthernet1/0
|
Note route 192.168.31.0/24 via 10.1.13.3 (BLUE) which has
just imported to VRF RED.
Now let’s advertise the networks in VRF RED to the global:
ip route 192.168.21.0
255.255.255.0 FastEthernet1/0
ip route 192.168.31.0
255.255.255.0 FastEthernet1/1
ip route vrf RED 0.0.0.0
0.0.0.0 10.1.14.4 global
ip route vrf BLUE 0.0.0.0
0.0.0.0 10.1.14.4 global
!
|
Note the first 2 lines route networks 192.168.21.0/24 and
192.168.31.0/24 to interface next-hop Fa1/0 and Fa1/1 accordingly. This way the
global routing table knows how to reach these networks.
The next 2 lines insert default route into the VRF’s routing
table allowing them access to the global routing table for every network that they
doesn’t know.
Let’s test R2 connectivity:
R2#ping 192.168.41.1 source
lo1
Type escape sequence to
abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP
Echos to 192.168.41.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
Packet sent with a source
address of 192.168.21.1
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent
(5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 32/43/48 ms
R2#ping 192.168.41.1
Type escape sequence to
abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP
Echos to 192.168.41.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
.....
Success rate is 0 percent
(0/5)
|
Note that only when using source interface Loopback1, R2 can
reach network 192.168.41.0/24 on R4, the reason is because I have configured
only network 192.168.21.0/24 on the global routing table.
VRF lite helps to create separate routing instances on a
single device but as we can see we can share networks and routes between the
VRF’s as needed.
No comments:
Post a Comment