My goal in the following lab is to test the options and features while redistributing routing protocols.
Here is the current topology:
1.
Virtual-link between area 0
and area 68, we need to configure the virtual link over area 36 because it is
the transit between 68 and 0, also note that the virtual link is done using the
router-id and not the IP.
R3:
router ospf 1
area 36 virtual-link 6.6.6.6
R6:
router ospf 1
area 36 virtual-link 6.6.6.6
|
2.
Area 17 has been configured
as a totally stub area which means no LSA types other then 1 and 2
R7:
router ospf 1
area 17 stub no-summary
R1:
router ospf 1
area 17 stub no-summary
|
3.
R4 is advertising
192.168.41.0/24 into RIP, R7 will redistribute it into OSPF Area 17
First we will create prefix-list and
route-map to limit the exact networks we are going to redistribute:
R7:
Ip prefix-list PL_NET41
permit 192.168.41.0/24
!
Route-map RM_RIP_TO_OSPF
permit 10
Match ip address prefix-list
PL_NET41
!
Route-map RM_RIP_TO_OSPF deny
100
!
|
Then we will using this route-map to
redistribute RIP into OSPF:
R7:
Router ospf 1
Redistribute rip subnets
route-map RM_RIP_TO_OSPF
!
|
And we got the following error message:
*Mar 3 11:43:48.353:
%OSPF-4-ASBR_WITHOUT_VALID_AREA: Router is currently an ASBR while having
only one area which is a stub area
|
The reason is that Area 17 is a stub area
hence he can’t advertise LSA type 5 (external routes), so let’s convert area 17
into an NSSA area which eventually allow us LSA type 1,2 and convert type 5
into type 7:
R7:
Router ospf 1
no area 17 stub no-summary
no area 17 stub
area 17 nssa no-summary
!
R1:
Router ospf 1
no area 17 stub no-summary
no area 17 stub
area 17 nssa no-summary
!
|
Note that the first no command only remove
the summary, the second no command remove the stub.
Now although area 17 is stub network he can
advertise external routes into OSPF domain
R1:
R1#sh ip route ospf
2.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O 2.2.2.2 [110/129] via 10.1.13.3,
00:02:55, Serial0/0.13
3.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O 3.3.3.3 [110/65] via 10.1.13.3,
00:02:55, Serial0/0.13
6.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O IA 6.6.6.6 [110/75] via 10.1.13.3, 00:02:45,
Serial0/0.13
O N2 192.168.41.0/24 [110/20] via 10.1.17.7,
00:02:45, FastEthernet0/1
7.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O 7.7.7.7 [110/2] via 10.1.17.7,
00:02:45, FastEthernet0/1
8.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O IA 8.8.8.8 [110/85] via 10.1.13.3, 00:02:45,
Serial0/0.13
192.168.81.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O IA 192.168.81.1 [110/85] via 10.1.13.3,
00:02:45, Serial0/0.13
192.168.83.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O IA 192.168.83.1 [110/85] via 10.1.13.3,
00:02:45, Serial0/0.13
10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 6 subnets
O 10.1.23.0 [110/128] via 10.1.13.3,
00:02:55, Serial0/0.13
O IA 10.1.36.0 [110/74] via 10.1.13.3,
00:02:45, Serial0/0.13
O IA 10.1.68.0 [110/84] via 10.1.13.3, 00:02:46,
Serial0/0.13
192.168.82.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O IA 192.168.82.1 [110/85] via 10.1.13.3,
00:02:46, Serial0/0.13
192.168.71.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O 192.168.71.1 [110/2] via 10.1.17.7,
00:02:46, FastEthernet0/1
|
Note that the network 192.168.41.0/24 is
marked with N2 which means it has learned via NSSA area external type 2.
External type 2 means a route with a
calculated metric, to this network, from the advertised router perspective -
R7, which is the ASBR in this case. This type along with metric 20 are defaults
for OSPF and we can change them while issue the command redistribute under OSPF
process.
4.
Now let’s redistribute
network 192.168.61.0/24 into RIP so we could ping network 192.168.41.0 from
192.168.61.0, the first problem that we will encounter is the fact the area 17
is totally NSSA area and he doesn’t know network 192.168.61.0. Let’s convert
area 17 into NSSA area only:
R7:
Router ospf 1
no area 17 nssa no-summary
!
R1:
Router ospf 1
no area 17 nssa no-summary
!
|
Configure prefix-list and route-map so we
could control what we are advertising:
R7:
Ip prefix-list PL_NET61
permit 192.168.61.0/24
!
Route-map RM_OSPF_TO_RIP
permit 10
Match ip address prefix-list
PL_NET61
!
Route-map RM_OSPF_TO_RIP deny
100
!
|
And redistribute OSPF into RIP:
R7:
Router rip
redistribute ospf 1 route-map RM_OSPF_TO_RIP
metric 5
!
|
Note that RIP doesn’t have default metric,
which calculated based on hop counts, so if we wouldn’t specific the metric the
network will be down.
While trying to redistribute
192.168.61.0/24 into RIP I have encounter a very common error,
In this lab I’m using loopback interfaces
to simulate LAN segments, OSPF doesn’t advertise loopback with their correct
prefix hence prefix-list PL_NET61 wouldn’t be able to catch this specific
network and nothing will be advertised:
R7#sh
ip prefix-list detail
Prefix-list
with the last deletion/insertion: PL_NET61
ip
prefix-list PL_NET41:
count: 1, range entries: 0, sequences: 5 -
5, refcount: 2
seq 5 permit 192.168.41.0/24 (hit count:
3, refcount: 1)
ip
prefix-list PL_NET61:
count: 1, range entries: 0, sequences: 5 -
5, refcount: 3
seq 5 permit 192.168.61.0/24 (hit count: 0, refcount: 1)
R7#sh
ip route 192.168.61.0
Routing
entry for 192.168.61.0/32,
1 known subnets
Redistributing via rip
O
IA 192.168.61.1 [110/76] via
10.1.17.1, 00:06:15, FastEthernet0/0
|
In order to fix that we need to configure
under any loopback the following command:
R6:
interface loopback 1
ip ospf network point-to-point
!
|
This will allow OSPF to advertise the
network with the correct prefix.
R7:
R7#sh ip route 192.168.61.0
Routing entry for 192.168.61.0/24
Known via "ospf 1", distance 110,
metric 76, type inter area
Redistributing via rip
Advertised by rip metric 5 route-map
RM_OSPF_TO_RIP
Last update from 10.1.17.1 on
FastEthernet0/0, 00:00:48 ago
Routing Descriptor Blocks:
* 10.1.17.1, from 1.1.1.1, 00:00:48 ago,
via FastEthernet0/0
Route metric is 76, traffic share count
is 1!
|
To verify the result:
R6#ping 192.168.41.1 source
lo1
Type escape sequence to
abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP
Echos to 192.168.41.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
Packet sent with a source
address of 192.168.61.1
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5),
round-trip min/avg/max =24/52/92 ms
R6#ping 192.168.41.1
Type escape sequence to
abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP
Echos to 192.168.41.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
.....
Success rate is 0 percent
(0/5)
|
Only when ping network 192.168.41.0 with
source 192.168.61.0 we are getting replies.
5.
Now let’s redistribute
192.168.41.0/24 into EIGRP AS100:
R4:
Ip prefix-list PL_NET41
permit 192.168.41.0/24
!
Route-map RM_CONNECTED_TO_EIGRP
permit 10
Match ip address prefix-list
PL_NET41
!
Route-map RM_CONNECTED_TO_EIGRP
deny 100
!
Router eigrp 100
redistribute connected
route-map RM_CONNECTED_TO_EIGRP
!
|
Note that we are redistributing connected
and not rip as network 192.168.41.0/24 is connected in R4.
Now network 192.168.41.0/24 is known by R5
as external EIGRP route
R5#sh ip route eigrp
4.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
D 4.4.4.4 [90/156160] via 10.1.45.4,
01:18:26, FastEthernet0/1
D EX 192.168.41.0/24
[170/156160] via 10.1.45.4, 00:01:36, FastEthernet0/1
10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 4 subnets
D 10.1.14.0 [90/284160] via 10.1.45.4,
01:18:26, FastEthernet0/1
|
So now let’s redistribute network
192.168.41.0/24 from EIGRP into OSPF domain on R2:
R2:
Ip prefix-list PL_NET41
permit 192.168.41.0/24
!
Route-map RM_EIGRP_TO_OSPF
permit 10
Match ip address prefix-list
PL_NET41
!
Route-map RM_EIGRP_TO_OSPF
deny 100
!
Router ospf 1
redistribute eigrp 100
subnets route-map RM_EIGRP_TO_OSPF
!
|
Again always control what you are
advertising.
Network 192.168.61.0/24 is learned via OSPF
so we will need to redistribute it to EIGRP on R2:
R2:
Ip prefix-list PL_NET61
permit 192.168.61.0/24
!
Route-map RM_OSPF_TO_EIGRP
permit 10
Match ip address prefix-list
PL_NET61
!
Route-map RM_OSPF_TO_EIGRP
deny 100
!
Router eigrp 100
redistribute ospf 1 route-map
RM_OSPF_TO_EIGRP metric 100000 10 255 1 1500
!
|
Very similar to RIP, EIGRP must be
redistributed with metric.
On R4 EIGRP is learn network
192.168.41.0/24 from RIP so we need to redistribute network 192.168.61.0/24
into EIGRP so we can have complete return path:
R4:
Ip prefix-list PL_NET61
permit 192.168.61.0/24
!
Route-map RM_EIGRP_TO_RIP
permit 10
Match ip address prefix-list
PL_NET61
!
Route-map RM_EIGRP_TO_RIP
deny 100
!
Router rip
redistribute eigrp 100
route-map RM_EIGRP_TO_RIP
!
|
So now after advertising network
192.168.61.0/24 all over the network let’s examine who learned what and from
where.
R6 is self-originate for this network
R3 is learning this network through OSPF from
R6:
R3#show ip route 192.168.61.0
Routing entry for
192.168.61.0/24
Known via "ospf 1", distance 110,
metric 11, type intra area
Last update from 10.1.36.6 on
FastEthernet0/0, 05:42:37 ago
Routing Descriptor Blocks:
* 10.1.36.6, from 6.6.6.6, 05:42:37 ago,
via FastEthernet0/0
|
R1 and R2 learn this network through OSPF
from R3:
R1#show ip route 192.168.61.0
Routing entry for
192.168.61.0/24
Known via "ospf 1", distance 110,
metric 75, type inter area
Last update from 10.1.13.3 on Serial0/0.13,
00:07:58 ago
Routing Descriptor Blocks:
* 10.1.13.3, from 3.3.3.3, 00:07:58 ago,
via Serial0/0.13
Route metric is 75, traffic share count
is 1
|
R2 is also redistributing this network to
EIGRP.
R5 is learning this network through EIGRP
from R2:
R5# show ip route
192.168.61.0
Routing entry for
192.168.61.0/24
Known via "eigrp 100", distance
170, metric 284160, type external
Redistributing via eigrp 100
Last update from 10.1.25.2 on
FastEthernet0/0, 00:15:43 ago
Routing Descriptor Blocks:
* 10.1.25.2, from 10.1.25.2, 00:15:43 ago,
via FastEthernet0/0
Route metric is 284160, traffic share
count is 1
Total delay is 1100 microseconds,
minimum bandwidth is 10000 Kbit
Reliability 255/255, minimum MTU 1500
bytes
Loading 1/255, Hops 1
|
R4 is learning this network from two
sources: EIGRP through R5 and RIP through R7, but in the routing table the
preferred route is through R7 as it got a better AD (RIP AD120, EIGRP External
AD170):
R4#show ip route 192.168.61.0
Routing entry for
192.168.61.0/24
Known via "rip", distance 120,
metric 5
Redistributing via rip
Last
update from 10.1.47.7 on FastEthernet0/1, 00:00:25 ago
Routing Descriptor Blocks:
* 10.1.47.7, from 10.1.47.7, 00:00:25 ago,
via FastEthernet0/1
Route metric is 5, traffic share count
is 1
|
And last R7 which learn this network
through OSPF from R1:
R7#sh ip route 192.168.61.0
Routing entry for
192.168.61.0/24
Known via "ospf 1", distance 110,
metric 76, type inter area
Redistributing via rip
Advertised by rip metric 5 route-map
RM_OSPF_TO_RIP
Last update from 10.1.17.1 on FastEthernet0/0,
00:16:40 ago
Routing Descriptor Blocks:
* 10.1.17.1, from 1.1.1.1, 00:16:40 ago,
via FastEthernet0/0
Route metric is 76, traffic share count
is 1
|
Now I like that R4 will prefer the route to
192.168.61.0/24 through R5 and not through R7:
R4:
ip access-list standard 61
permit 192.168.61.0 0.0.0.255
!
Router rip
distance 180 10.1.47.7
0.0.0.0 61
!
|
Using the distance command I can raise up
the AD value of specific routes received from R7, in this case network
192.168.61.0/24 which will received from R7 will be with an AD of 180 which be
higher then EIGRP external (AD 170).
No comments:
Post a Comment